Byrd v. State

582 So. 2d 640, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 1991 WL 15595
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 6, 1991·No. No. 90-1973·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon examination of the record and the state’s confession of error, the defendant’s conviction must be reversed with directions to award a new trial because when the trial court re-instructed the jury, the entire written instructions in the case were not, over objection of defense counsel, delivered to the jury as required by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.400(c). Consequently, the jury may have placed undue emphasis upon the re-instruction given. Chappell v. State, 423 So.2d 984 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Morgan v. State, 377 So.2d 212, 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. denied, 389 So.2d 1115 (Fla.1980).

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. State, 582 So. 2d 640, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 977, 1991 WL 15595 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

582 So. 2d 640 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Franklin
618 So. 2d 171 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)