Byrd v. State

467 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 1, 1985
DocketNo. AW-176
StatusPublished

This text of 467 So. 2d 1093 (Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. State, 467 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.

JOANOS, JJ., concur. THOMPSON and ZEHMER,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.