Byrd v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Byrd v. State

467 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 419 So. 2d 725 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 1, 1985·No. No. AW-176·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.

JOANOS, JJ., concur. THOMPSON and ZEHMER,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

After carefully reviewing the entire record, we find no reversible error. The orders of probation entered by the trial court, however, incorrectly state the offenses of selling cocaine and selling cannabis, while the jury found Byrd guilty of the lesser included offense of possession of cocaine and Byrd pled nolo contendere to possession of less than twenty grams of cannabis. The orders of probation must be corrected to reflect the proper offenses. Accordingly, this cause is remanded for correction of these errors.

JOANOS, JJ., concur. THOMPSON and ZEHMER,

Byrd v. State, 467 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1107, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13835 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

467 So. 2d 1093 (Byrd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.