Byrd v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Byrd v. State

123 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 613

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 1929

Docket8 Div. 894.

StatusPublished

This text of 123 So. 924 (Byrd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. State, 123 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 613 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. The corpus delicti was proven, but there is no evidence connecting this defendant with the possession of the still. The defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge. Clark v. State, 18 Ala. App. 217, 90 So. 16; Koonce v. State, 18 Ala. App. 438, 93 So. 214; Knight v. State, 19 Ala. App. 296, 97 So. 163.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on a charge of unlawfully possessing a still. The corpus delicti was proven, but there is no evidence connecting this defendant with the possession of the still. The defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge. Clark v. State, 18 Ala. App. 217, 90 So. 16; Koonce v. State, 18 Ala. App. 438, 93 So. 214; Knight v. State, 19 Ala. App. 296, 97 So. 163.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 So. 924, 23 Ala. App. 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-state-alactapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack