Byrd v. River Parish Maintenance, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Byrd v. River Parish Maintenance, Inc.

695 So. 2d 976, 1997 La. LEXIS 1732, 1997 WL 339615

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 13, 1997

DocketNo. 97-CC-1038

StatusPublished

This text of 695 So. 2d 976 (Byrd v. River Parish Maintenance, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. River Parish Maintenance, Inc., 695 So. 2d 976, 1997 La. LEXIS 1732, 1997 WL 339615 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re River Parish Maintenance, Inc.;— Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 46,079; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 97-CW-0089.

Granted. Plaintiff has failed to make a sufficient showing that denial of production of the statement will unfairly prejudice him, or result in undue hardship or injustice. La. Code Civ.P. art. 1424; cf. Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So.2d 953 (La.1977). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court ordering production of the statements is reversed and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON and KIMBALL, JJ., dissent from the order. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re River Parish Maintenance, Inc.;— Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of St. Charles, 29th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 46,079; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 97-CW-0089.

Granted. Plaintiff has failed to make a sufficient showing that denial of production of the statement will unfairly prejudice him, or result in undue hardship or injustice. La. Code Civ.P. art. 1424; cf. Ogea v. Jacobs, 344 So.2d 953 (La.1977). Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court ordering production of the statements is reversed and set aside, and the case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings.

CALOGERO, C.J., and LEMMON and KIMBALL, JJ., dissent from the order. JOHNSON, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

695 So. 2d 976, 1997 La. LEXIS 1732, 1997 WL 339615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-river-parish-maintenance-inc-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack