Byrd v. North Carolina State University

Fourth Circuit

Byrd v. North Carolina State University

60 F. App'x 954

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 22, 2003

DocketNo. 03-1217

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F. App'x 954 (Byrd v. North Carolina State University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. North Carolina State University, 60 F. App'x 954 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Victor Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Byrd v. North Carolina State Univ., No. CA-02-112-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Victor Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Byrd v. North Carolina State Univ., No. CA-02-112-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F. App'x 954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-north-carolina-state-university-ca4-2003.