Byrd v. North Carolina

298 F. App'x 287
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. North Carolina. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 F. App'x 235
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 29, 2008·No. No. 08-7237·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Steven Glen Byrd appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Byrd v. North Carolina, No. 3:08-cv-00070-FDW-CH, 2008 WL 2782839 (W.D.N.C. July 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. North Carolina, 298 F. App'x 287 (4th Cir. 2008).

298 F. App'x 287 (Byrd v. North Carolina) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related