Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission

DecidedDecember 17, 2001

DocketI.C. NO. TA-16479

StatusPublished

This text of Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction (Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. N.C. Dept. of Correction, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

The undersigned have reviewed this matter including the briefs of the parties and the prior Order of Commissioner Ballance. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider or amend the Order. Therefore, the Full Commission adopts and affirms the prior Order of Commissioner Balance and enters the following Order.

Plaintiff's claim was not timely filed and is therefore barred by the Statute of Limitations. Moreover, even if plaintiff's claim were timely filed, plaintiff has not stated a claim for negligence. Therefore, defendant's motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED.

This the ___ day of December 2001.

S/_______________ DIANNE C. SELLERS COMMISSIONER

CONCURRING:

S/____________ BUCK LATTIMORE CHAIRMAN

S/______________ RENE C. RIGGSBEE COMMISSIONER

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI