Byrd v. Michael
This text of 287 So. 2d 119 (Byrd v. Michael) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the court below appellees sued appellant for a real estate brokerage commission and prevailed. The sole point there and here was whether the transaction was “closed” so as to entitle the appellees to their commission. The trial court held it was closed and entered judgment for the commission.
On the record before us at this time, absent any suggestion of fraud on appellant’s part, we find the sale was not closed as provided in the brokerage contract and that appellees’’ suit was premature. Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed with directions to dismiss the cause,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
287 So. 2d 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-michael-fladistctapp-1973.