Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department. Read the opinion of the Court — 629 F.3d 1135
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2009·No. 07-16640·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHARLES EDWARD BYRD,  Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 07-16640 MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF’S  D.C. No. CV-04-02701-NVW DEPARTMENT; JOSEPH M. ARPAIO; KATHLEEN O’CONNELL; AUSTIN ORDER PETERSON; DURANGO JAIL, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed October 6, 2009

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

14533 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department, (9th Cir. 2009).

Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department (Byrd v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Department) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.