Byrd v. Lewis

527 F.3d 1359, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12338, 2008 WL 2345271
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Byrd v. Lewis. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 F.3d 855
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 10, 2008·No. No. 06-15977·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Submission of this ease is WITHDRAWN and DEFERRED pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Pulido v. Chrones, 487 F.3d 669 (9th Cir.2007) (per curiam), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 1444, 170 L.Ed.2d 274 (2008). The Court’s framing of the question presented in Pulido suggests that the opinion will clarify how Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1, 119 S.Ct. 1827, 144 L.Ed.2d 35 (1999), applies to all defective jury instructions.

The opinion filed on December 11, 2007, published at 510 F.3d 1045, is WITHDRAWN. It may not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit until further order of the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Lewis, 527 F.3d 1359, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 12338, 2008 WL 2345271 (9th Cir. 2008).

527 F.3d 1359 (Byrd v. Lewis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neder v. United States
527 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1999)
Byrd v. Lewis
510 F.3d 1045 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)