Byrd v. Lawrimore

47 S.E.2d 728, 212 S.C. 281
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedMay 4, 1948
Docket16073
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 47 S.E.2d 728 (Byrd v. Lawrimore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. Lawrimore, 47 S.E.2d 728, 212 S.C. 281 (S.C. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that the case of Duke Power Company v. Bell, 156 S. C. 299, 152 S. E. 865, should be overruled, or held to apply only to the particular facts of that case; and on the petition of the appellant, we granted to him the right to criticize and argue against the holding in said case. However, no sound reason has been advanced why the Duke Power Compansy-Bell case should be overruled, and not here followed.

Being satisfied with the decree of the Honorable L. D. Lide, Judge of the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, we direct that his said decree be published as the opinion of this Court.

Affirmed.

Baker, C. J., and Pish burns, Stukes, Taylor, and Oxner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Elliott v. McNair
156 S.E.2d 421 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1967)
City of Darlington v. AW STANLEY, JR.
122 S.E.2d 207 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1961)
Deese v. Williams
113 S.E.2d 823 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1960)
WEST VA. PULP & PAPER CO. v. Riddock
82 S.E.2d 189 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 S.E.2d 728, 212 S.C. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-lawrimore-sc-1948.