Byrd v. Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co.

176 So. 2d 86, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3183
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 9, 1965
DocketNo. 34110
StatusPublished

This text of 176 So. 2d 86 (Byrd v. Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. Hav-A-Tampa Cigar Co., 176 So. 2d 86, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3183 (Fla. 1965).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we-have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 31, 1964,

We find that oral argument would serve-no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that. [87]*87there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., •concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 So. 2d 86, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 3183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-hav-a-tampa-cigar-co-fla-1965.