Byrd v. Garner Police Department

112 F. App'x 303
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 9, 2004
DocketNo. 04-2036
StatusPublished

This text of 112 F. App'x 303 (Byrd v. Garner Police Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. Garner Police Department, 112 F. App'x 303 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leslie Wayne Byrd appeals from a district court order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claims against the State of North Carolina as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). The court permitted Byrd to proceed with claims against the other parties. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain inter[304]*304locutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order as to all of Byrd’s claims nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-garner-police-department-ca4-2004.