Byrd v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7878

STEVEN ALLEN BYRD,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; MILDRED RIVERA, Warden; ZOLTAN R. VENDEL, Dr., Clinical Director; ANITA JONES, Camp Administrator,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (2:08-cv-03540-TLW)

Submitted: May 17, 2010 Decided: June 3, 2010

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven Allen Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Beth Drake, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Steven Byrd appeals the district court’s order

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant

Defendants summary judgment on Byrd’s claims, which the

magistrate judge construed as being filed pursuant to Bivens v.

Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Byrd v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 2:08-cv-

03540-TLW (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2009). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED