BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJune 25, 2020
Docket2:18-cv-05248
StatusUnknown

This text of BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (E.D. Pa. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTONIO MICHAEL BYRD, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : : CIVIL ACTION No. 18-5248-RAL ANDREW M. SAUL, : Commissioner of Social Security, : : Defendant. : : O R D E R AND NOW this 25th day of June, 2020, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), ECF Doc. No. 24, the Commissioner’s response thereto, ECF Doc. No. 25, and the Plaintiff’s Reply, ECF Doc. No. 26 it is ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay attorney’s fees pursuant to EAJA to Plaintiff in the amount of $9,640.80. Fees are payable to Plaintiff. See Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 591 (2010) (holding award of EAJA fees are payable to plaintiff, not her attorney). The reasons for this award are set forth in the Memorandum Opinion filed contemporaneously herewith. SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_s/ Richard A. Lloret_________ RICHARD A. LLORET U.S. Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BYRD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-commissioner-of-social-security-paed-2020.