Byrd v. Cocke

1 Va. 297
Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided October 15, 1793·Published

Opinion

The President

delivered the opinion of the Court.

If the declaration could be supported, the Court might get over the errors which precede and follow it, either by considering them as cured by the verdict, or by awarding a repleader from the first fault. Bui the declaration is certainly in debt, and though, after a verdict, objections to the form of a declaration will be disregarded, yet we can find no authority to justify a rejection of that part of it, as surplusage, which designates it a declaration in debt. As an action of debt, it is not sustainable under the Act of Assembly, which does not impose a penalty upon the officer; and therefore, an action upon the case for consequential damages, was most clearly the proper remedy.

Both judgments must be reversed with costs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Cocke, 1 Va. 297 (Va. Ct. App. 1793).

1 Va. 297 (Byrd v. Cocke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.