Byrd v. Central Freight Lines, Inc.

992 S.W.2d 447, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 44, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 44, 1999 WL 250918
Texas Supreme Court·Decided April 29, 1999·No. No. 98-0845·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After Stephen Byrd was injured on the job, he sued his employer, Central Freight Lines, Inc. Central was not a workers’ compensation insurance subscriber. The jury returned a verdict awarding Byrd $50,000 in damages. But after offsetting undisputed credits to Central of $104,-[448]*448698.85 based on payments Central made for Byrd’s medical expenses and salary after his injury, the trial court entered a take-nothing judgment. The court of appeals affirmed. 976 S.W.2d 257. Because of the offset, the court of appeals’ judgment is correct. Consequently, we deny Byrd’s petition for review. We neither approve nor disapprove the lower court’s dictum that “comparative negligence is an element of a worker’s non-subscriber action against the employer outside the [Texas Workers’ Compensation] Act.” Id. at 260.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byrd v. Central Freight Lines, Inc., 992 S.W.2d 447, 42 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 44, 1999 Tex. LEXIS 44, 1999 WL 250918 (Tex. 1999).

992 S.W.2d 447 (Byrd v. Central Freight Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kroger Co. v. Keng
23 S.W.3d 347 (Texas Supreme Court, 2000)
Brookshire Bros., Inc. v. Lewis
997 S.W.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)