Byrd v. Becket

Opinion

Marsha Byrd, Case No.: 2:22-cv-01997-JAD-BNW

Plaintiff Order Adopting Report and v. Recommendation and Dismissing Case

Robert Becket, [ECF No. 6]

Defendant

When Plaintiff Marsha Byrd filed this case without paying the required filing fee or submitting an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), the court gave her a second chance to do so.1 Byrd then filed an incomplete IFP application, which was denied, and Byrd was given until February 10, 2023, to try again.2 She was advised that her failure to comply with that order could result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed.3 Byrd has taken no action since that order, so the magistrate judge recommends that her case be dismissed.4 The deadline to object to that recommendation passed with no request to extend it. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”5 Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. 1 ECF No. 3. 2 ECF No. 5. 3 Id. 4 ECF No. 6. 5 Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). ] IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 6] is ADOPTED in its entirety. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE. memes 6 USS. District3 dge Jel | er A. Dorsey □ Dated: March 9, 2023 7 8 9 1]