Byrd v. Baltimore Sun Co.

110 F. App'x 365
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2004
DocketNo. 03-2219
StatusPublished

This text of 110 F. App'x 365 (Byrd v. Baltimore Sun Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byrd v. Baltimore Sun Co., 110 F. App'x 365 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Karl G. Byrd, Sr., appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Byrd’s employment discrimination action and denying Byrd’s motion for a continuance and motion to strike materials submitted in support of summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Byrd v. Baltimore Sun Co., 279 F.Supp.2d 662 (D.Md.2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Byrd v. the Baltimore Sun Co.
279 F. Supp. 2d 662 (D. Maryland, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 F. App'x 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-baltimore-sun-co-ca4-2004.