Byrd v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Byrd v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.

155 S.E. 190, 171 Ga. 251, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 327

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 1, 1930

DocketNo. 7235

StatusPublished

This text of 155 S.E. 190 (Byrd v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byrd v. Atlanta Title & Trust Co., 155 S.E. 190, 171 Ga. 251, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 327 (Ga. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The exceptions are to judgments refusing to allow amendments to the petition, and sustaining a general demurrer. The petition failed to set out a cause of action; and the amendments, in so far as they were germane, failed to perfect the petition. The court did not err, therefore, in the rulings to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw and Archibald H. Davis, for plaintiff. Tye, Thomson & Tye, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The exceptions are to judgments refusing to allow amendments to the petition, and sustaining a general demurrer. The petition failed to set out a cause of action; and the amendments, in so far as they were germane, failed to perfect the petition. The court did not err, therefore, in the rulings to which exception is taken.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Anderson, Rountree & Crenshaw and Archibald H. Davis, for plaintiff. Tye, Thomson & Tye, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 S.E. 190, 171 Ga. 251, 1930 Ga. LEXIS 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byrd-v-atlanta-title-trust-co-ga-1930.