Byong Seol Song v. Holder

452 F. App'x 783
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2011
Docket06-73299
StatusUnpublished

This text of 452 F. App'x 783 (Byong Seol Song v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byong Seol Song v. Holder, 452 F. App'x 783 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ***

Byong Seol Song and Mi K Song, natives and citizens of South Korea, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact. Kim v. Holder, 603 F.3d 1100, 1102 (9th Cir.2010). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s finding of removability by clear and convincing evidence. See id. at 1103.

Petitioners lack standing to assert their equal protection contention because “they do not belong to the class of returning [Lawful Permanent Residents] who are allegedly similarly situated to applicants for admission.” Id. at 1104.

Petitioners’ remaining contention is not persuasive.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.

***

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sang Yoon Kim v. Holder
603 F.3d 1100 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 F. App'x 783, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byong-seol-song-v-holder-ca9-2011.