Bynum v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Bynum v. State

726 S.W.2d 760, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3552

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 27, 1987·No. No. 51037·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 27.26 after an evidentiary hearing to set aside his sentence of twelve years imposed following his plea of guilty to two charges of forcible rape and one charge of burglary in the second degree.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings which are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 27.26 after an evidentiary hearing to set aside his sentence of twelve years imposed following his plea of guilty to two charges of forcible rape and one charge of burglary in the second degree.

The judgment of the trial court is based on findings which are not clearly erroneous. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Bynum v. State, 726 S.W.2d 760, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3552 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

726 S.W.2d 760 (Bynum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.