Bynum v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bynum v. State

221 S.E.2d 571, 235 Ga. 783, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1442

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1976

Docket30219

StatusPublished

This text of 221 S.E.2d 571 (Bynum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bynum v. State, 221 S.E.2d 571, 235 Ga. 783, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1442 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a conviction by a jury for armed robbery. The appellant and two others robbed a victim of money by use of a pistol. Two eyewitnesses identified the appellant as one of the three persons participating in the robbery.

The appellant has enumerated five errors in this court. We have reviewed the record, and we find that all five enumerated errors are frivolous to the extent that they do not warrant treatment in this opinion. The evidence was more than ample to sustain the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a conviction by a jury for armed robbery. The appellant and two others robbed a victim of money by use of a pistol. Two eyewitnesses identified the appellant as one of the three persons participating in the robbery.

The appellant has enumerated five errors in this court. We have reviewed the record, and we find that all five enumerated errors are frivolous to the extent that they do not warrant treatment in this opinion. The evidence was more than ample to sustain the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

221 S.E.2d 571, 235 Ga. 783, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bynum-v-state-ga-1976.