Bynum v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Bynum v. State

221 S.E.2d 571, 235 Ga. 783, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1442

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 6, 1976·No. 30219·Published

Opinion

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a conviction by a jury for armed robbery. The appellant and two others robbed a victim of money by use of a pistol. Two eyewitnesses identified the appellant as one of the three persons participating in the robbery.

The appellant has enumerated five errors in this court. We have reviewed the record, and we find that all five enumerated errors are frivolous to the extent that they do not warrant treatment in this opinion. The evidence was more than ample to sustain the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gunter, Justice.

This appeal is from a conviction by a jury for armed robbery. The appellant and two others robbed a victim of money by use of a pistol. Two eyewitnesses identified the appellant as one of the three persons participating in the robbery.

The appellant has enumerated five errors in this court. We have reviewed the record, and we find that all five enumerated errors are frivolous to the extent that they do not warrant treatment in this opinion. The evidence was more than ample to sustain the conviction.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Bynum v. State, 221 S.E.2d 571, 235 Ga. 783, 1976 Ga. LEXIS 1442 (Ga. 1976).

Pincite

221 S.E.2d 571 (Bynum v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.