Bynum v. State
This text of 57 So. 1024 (Bynum v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tbe indictment in this case charged that tbe defendant, “a person liable to road duty, willfully failed or refused, after legal notice, to work the public road, either in person or by substitute, without a sufficient excuse therefor, against tbe peace,” etc. Tbe allegation of tbe commission of tbe offense substantially followed tbe terms of tbe statute creating it. Tbe indictment sufficiently designated tbe offense, without- specifying what road tbe defendant failed to work.—Brown v. State, 63 Ala. 97. Tbe demurrer to it was properly overruled.
Tbe record presents no other question for review.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 So. 1024, 3 Ala. App. 117, 1912 Ala. App. LEXIS 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bynum-v-state-alactapp-1912.