Bynum v. Durham City Schools
This text of Bynum v. Durham City Schools (Bynum v. Durham City Schools) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The 30 January 1997 decision by the North Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the Full Commission's Opinion and Award which found that plaintiff was not permanently and totally disabled and which denied plaintiff's Motion to Set Aside an Industrial Commission Form 26 Agreement for Compensation.
Upon appeal by plaintiff, the Court of Appeals found that the Full Commission had not made a proper inquiry as to the fairness of the Form 26 Agreement for Compensation. The court remanded this case to the Industrial Commission in order to make such an inquiry and for further proceedings to determine what compensation to which plaintiff may be entitled.
Therefore, the Full Commission hereby ORDERS that this matter is REMANDED to a Deputy Commissioner who shall compile the record of evidence relating to the following issues: (1) the fairness of the terms of the Industrial Commission Form 26 Agreement for Compensation, and; (2) the proper award to which plaintiff may be entitled. Upon the closing of the record on these issues, the Deputy Commissioner shall refer this matter back to the Full Commission for a final determination.
No additional costs are assessed.
S/ ___________________________ THOMAS J. BOLCH COMMISSIONER
CONCURRING:
S/ __________________ J. HOWARD BUNN, JR. CHAIRMAN
S/ __________________ LAURA K. MAVRETIC COMMISSIONER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bynum v. Durham City Schools, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bynum-v-durham-city-schools-ncworkcompcom-1997.