Bynum v. Dalton

Mississippi Supreme Court

Bynum v. Dalton

48 So. 1019, 95 Miss. 429

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1909·Published

Opinion

Whiteiedd, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The relations between Bynum and Dalton are governed by the contract between them that Dalton was to pay Bynum’s expenses. The expenses are conceded to have been $80, and that is all that Bynum retained of the $200' originally handed him by Dalton. It was no concern to Dalton what occurred between Bynum and the board of supervisors. That was a matter between Bynum and the state.

The court below erred, the judgment is reversed, and judgment will be entered here for the appellant.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whiteiedd, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The relations between Bynum and Dalton are governed by the contract between them that Dalton was to pay Bynum’s expenses. The expenses are conceded to have been $80, and that is all that Bynum retained of the $200' originally handed him by Dalton. It was no concern to Dalton what occurred between Bynum and the board of supervisors. That was a matter between Bynum and the state.

The court below erred, the judgment is reversed, and judgment will be entered here for the appellant.

Reversed.

Bynum v. Dalton, 48 So. 1019, 95 Miss. 429 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

48 So. 1019 (Bynum v. Dalton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.