Bynoe v. City of New York

281 A.D.2d 340, 722 N.Y.S.2d 517, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered February 2, 2000, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination terminating petitioner’s provisional employment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s evidence that over the course of his year-and-a half provisional employment he received only one performance evaluation six months after his appointment, which was favorable, does not satisfy his burden of showing that his termination was in bad faith or arbitrary and capricious (see, Matter of Romero v Joseph, 169 AD2d 544). There is evidence of petitioner’s substandard performance as well (see, Matter of Atkinson v Koch, 161 AD2d 152, 153-154), and no evidence that respondent was required to give him periodic performance evaluations. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Andrias, Wallach, Lerner and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bynoe v. City of New York, 281 A.D.2d 340, 722 N.Y.S.2d 517, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 340 (Bynoe v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atkinson v. Koch
161 A.D.2d 152 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Romero v. Joseph
169 A.D.2d 544 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)