Bynes v. State

581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6757, 1991 WL 117039
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1991
DocketNo. 90-1846
StatusPublished

This text of 581 So. 2d 654 (Bynes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bynes v. State, 581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6757, 1991 WL 117039 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

We agree with defendant that the information charging burglary and petit theft of property of Mr. Cajigas should not have been consolidated for trial with the crimes perpetrated on Treskovich and Schweir; accordingly the convictions for burglary and petit theft in case no. 89-7581 are reversed and remanded for a new trial. Finfrock v. State, 507 So.2d 1230 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). There is no merit to appellant’s other points on appeal.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Finfrock v. State
507 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
581 So. 2d 654, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 6757, 1991 WL 117039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bynes-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.