Byne v. Smith

Supreme Court of Georgia

Byne v. Smith

1 Ga. L. Rep. 69

DecidedJuly 1, 1885

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 69 (Byne v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byne v. Smith, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 69 (Ga. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Blandford, J.

1. Looking at the whole charge, there was no error in it; it was a full and fair submission of the law covering the facts in the case, and the refusals to charge complained of were substantially «covered by the charge given.

D. A. Yason; C. B. Wooten, for plaintiff in error. E. G. Simmons; W. H. Kimbrough, for defendant.

2. The evidence was conflicting, and there was sufficient to sustain, the verdict of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blandford, J.

1. Looking at the whole charge, there was no error in it; it was a full and fair submission of the law covering the facts in the case, and the refusals to charge complained of were substantially «covered by the charge given.

D. A. Yason; C. B. Wooten, for plaintiff in error. E. G. Simmons; W. H. Kimbrough, for defendant.

2. The evidence was conflicting, and there was sufficient to sustain, the verdict of the jury.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byne-v-smith-ga-1885.