Byler v. United States Coast Guard
This text of Byler v. United States Coast Guard (Byler v. United States Coast Guard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 24 2026 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARREN K. BYLER, No. 24-3968 D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00281-RRB Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES COAST GUARD; AARON WOODS, USCG CGIS Agent; SARA LOVETTE, USCG LT. (Ret.),
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Alaska Ralph R. Beistline, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 18, 2026**
Before: CALLAHAN, FRIEDLAND, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.
Darren K. Byler appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his Federal Tort Claims Act action alleging torts arising during his post-conviction
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). challenge to his criminal conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) on
the basis of Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). Sanders v. City of Pittsburg,
14 F.4th 968, 970 (9th Cir. 2021). We affirm.
The district court properly dismissed Byler’s action as Heck-barred because
success on Byler’s claims would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction,
and Byler has not demonstrated that his conviction has been invalidated. See Heck,
512 U.S. at 486-87 (holding that if “a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would
necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence . . . the complaint
must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or
sentence has already been invalidated”).
Byler’s motion (Docket Entry No. 17) to file exhibits conventionally is
denied.
AFFIRMED.
2 24-3968
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Byler v. United States Coast Guard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byler-v-united-states-coast-guard-ca9-2026.