Bylandt v. Bylandt

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Bylandt v. Bylandt

6 N.J. Eq. 28

DecidedDecember 15, 1846

StatusPublished

This text of 6 N.J. Eq. 28 (Bylandt v. Bylandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bylandt v. Bylandt, 6 N.J. Eq. 28 (N.J. Ct. App. 1846).

Pincite

Opinion

The Chancelor.

It would be irregular to grant the ne ex-eat under these circumstances. There was no cause or proceeding in Court respecting the subject of the affidavit made by Romein when it was made. 1 Beat. 327.

The proper course is, to file the bill or petition for divorce, and after that to file, a petition for the ne exeat, supported by the necessary affidavit, sworn subsequently to the filing of the bill.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Chancelor.

It would be irregular to grant the ne ex-eat under these circumstances. There was no cause or proceeding in Court respecting the subject of the affidavit made by Romein when it was made. 1 Beat. 327.

The proper course is, to file the bill or petition for divorce, and after that to file, a petition for the ne exeat, supported by the necessary affidavit, sworn subsequently to the filing of the bill.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 N.J. Eq. 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bylandt-v-bylandt-njch-1846.