Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials

643 F. App'x 286
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 5, 2016
DocketNo. 15-1952
StatusPublished

This text of 643 F. App'x 286 (Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials, 643 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexei Bykhovski appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion [287]*287for summary judgment on Bykhovski’s complaint alleging that Defendant discriminated against him based on his sex and age when making certain hiring decisions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bykhovski’s motions to supplement the record and affirm the district court’s judgment. Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials, No. 5:14-cv-00378-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
643 F. App'x 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bykhovski-v-neurocog-trials-ca4-2016.