Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials

643 F. App'x 286
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 5, 2016·No. No. 15-1952·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Alexei Bykhovski appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion [287] for summary judgment on Bykhovski’s complaint alleging that Defendant discriminated against him based on his sex and age when making certain hiring decisions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Bykhovski’s motions to supplement the record and affirm the district court’s judgment. Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials, No. 5:14-cv-00378-BO (E.D.N.C. July 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials, 643 F. App'x 286 (4th Cir. 2016).

643 F. App'x 286 (Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.