Byington v. Byington

Ohio Supreme Court

Byington v. Byington

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 26, 1964·No. No. 37876·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The answers allege a lawful order of the Juvenile Court of Licking County committing the child to two of the respondents, and that such order remains in full force and effect. The allegations of these answers have not been denied or challenged by reply.

Our statutes confer jurisdiction on the Juvenile Court with respect to custody of a neglected or dependent child. See Section 2151.23, Revised Code.

Relief denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The answers allege a lawful order of the Juvenile Court of Licking County committing the child to two of the respondents, and that such order remains in full force and effect. The allegations of these answers have not been denied or challenged by reply.

Our statutes confer jurisdiction on the Juvenile Court with respect to custody of a neglected or dependent child. See Section 2151.23, Revised Code.

Relief denied.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, O’Neill, Griffith, Herbert and Gibson, JJ., concur. Matthias, J., not participating.

Byington v. Byington, 175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513 (Ohio 1964).

Pincite

175 Ohio St. (N.S.) 513 (Byington v. Byington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.