Byers v. State

1930 OK CR 103, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 358, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 484
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 15, 1930·No. No. A-7158.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PFR CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Carter county on a charge of having unlawful possession of three half-pints of whisky, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

*359 The evidence of the state was that two deputy sheriffs searched the pool hall of the defendant under a search warrant and found three one-half pints of whisky. The state introduced no other proof to show the intent of the defendant. The possession of three one-half pints of whisky by the defendant was not sufficient evidence to make a prima facie case. The proof must either show possession in excess of one quart or there must be other competent testimony showing the intent of the defendant to violate the Prohibitory Liquor Law (Comp. St. 1921, §§ 6982-7039, as amended) through such possession.

The evidence being insufficient to support the verdict of the jury, the cause is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byers v. State, 1930 OK CR 103, 287 P. 1075, 46 Okla. Crim. 358, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 484 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

1930 OK CR 103 (Byers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. State
1941 OK CR 71 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)
Bateman v. State
1941 OK CR 67 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1941)