Byers v. State

505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2016 WL 6956750
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 29, 2016
DocketED 103657
StatusPublished

This text of 505 S.W.3d 377 (Byers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byers v. State, 505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2016 WL 6956750 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David K. Byers appeals, after an eviden-tiary hearing, from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 S.W.3d 377, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1223, 2016 WL 6956750, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byers-v-state-moctapp-2016.