Byers v. . Rose

144 S.E. 924, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 398
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 19, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 144 S.E. 924 (Byers v. . Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byers v. . Rose, 144 S.E. 924, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 398 (N.C. 1928).

Opinion

Civil action to recover damages for injury to plaintiff's eye, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant in failing properly to provide a reasonably safe place, or to furnish tools and appliances reasonably suitable for the work in which plaintiff and another, Robert Jones, as employees of the defendant, were engaged at the time, *Page 800 to wit, in removing wooden casings from concrete posts on the third floor of the new Wilson County courthouse.

Robert Jones was standing on a scaffold driving a wedge between two of the plank casings, for the purpose of prizing them off, when the scaffold gave way, caused him to miss the wedge, or to foul it, and his hammer flew off and injured the plaintiff who was standing on the opposite side of the post. The record is silent as to whether the hammer belonged to the defendant or Jones.

At the conclusion of all the evidence, upon motion of defendant, judgment of nonsuit was entered in the case, from which the plaintiff appeals, assigning error. The plaintiff's injury seems to have been the result of an unfortunate accident, or at least we have not been able to discover any valid reason for disturbing the judgment of nonsuit on the record as presented.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
144 S.E. 924, 196 N.C. 799, 1928 N.C. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byers-v-rose-nc-1928.