Byers v. KUNA MEAT COMPANY, INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Byers v. KUNA MEAT COMPANY, INC.

180 S.W.3d 80, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1930, 2005 WL 3466040

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 27, 2005

DocketED 86219

StatusPublished

This text of 180 S.W.3d 80 (Byers v. KUNA MEAT COMPANY, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Byers v. KUNA MEAT COMPANY, INC., 180 S.W.3d 80, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1930, 2005 WL 3466040 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*81 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Byers (“Byers”) appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“LIRC”) affirming the decision of the appeals tribunal of the Division of Employment Security denying his claim for unemployment benefits. Byers claims the LIRC erred in finding that he voluntarily left employment without good cause attributable to the employer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the LIRC affirming the decision of the appeals tribunal is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*81 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David Byers (“Byers”) appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“LIRC”) affirming the decision of the appeals tribunal of the Division of Employment Security denying his claim for unemployment benefits. Byers claims the LIRC erred in finding that he voluntarily left employment without good cause attributable to the employer.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The order of the LIRC affirming the decision of the appeals tribunal is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

180 S.W.3d 80, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1930, 2005 WL 3466040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byers-v-kuna-meat-company-inc-moctapp-2005.