Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

652 N.E.2d 643, 73 Ohio St. 3d 51
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 16, 1995·No. No. 94-1200·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp., 652 N.E.2d 643, 73 Ohio St. 3d 51 (Ohio 1995).

652 N.E.2d 643 (Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delahunt v. Cytodyne Technologies
241 F. Supp. 2d 827 (S.D. Ohio, 2003)
White v. Depuy, Inc.
718 N.E.2d 450 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.
1998 Ohio 388 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.
1997 Ohio 12 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Long v. Tokai Bank of California
682 N.E.2d 1052 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)
Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp.
1995 Ohio 216 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)