Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

652 N.E.2d 643, 73 Ohio St. 3d 51
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 16, 1995
DocketNo. 94-1200
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 652 N.E.2d 643 (Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Byers v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp., 652 N.E.2d 643, 73 Ohio St. 3d 51 (Ohio 1995).

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the judgment of the trial court is reinstated on the authority of McAuliffe v. W. States Import Co., Inc. (1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 534, 651 N.E.2d 957.

Moyer, C.J., Wright, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Delahunt v. Cytodyne Technologies
241 F. Supp. 2d 827 (S.D. Ohio, 2003)
White v. Depuy, Inc.
718 N.E.2d 450 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
Sutowski v. Eli Lilly & Co.
1998 Ohio 388 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)
Carrel v. Allied Products Corp.
1997 Ohio 12 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1997)
Long v. Tokai Bank of California
682 N.E.2d 1052 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1996)
Byers v. Consol. Aluminum Corp.
1995 Ohio 216 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 N.E.2d 643, 73 Ohio St. 3d 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/byers-v-consolidated-aluminum-corp-ohio-1995.