Byers, Jr. v. Hill

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided September 13, 2022·No. 3:21-cv-01317·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

PATRICK ALBERT BYERS, Jr., ) #43310-037, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 21-cv-01317-JPG ) KATHY HILL, ) DAN SPROUL, ) J. LECLAIR, ) T. CRAWFORD, ) and USA, ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER DISMISSING CASE GILBERT, District Judge: Plaintiff Patrick Byers, Jr., filed this action in state court pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), to challenge interference with his mail by staff at the United States Penitentiary in Marion, Illinois. (Doc. 1-1). Plaintiff claims that staff interference with his incoming non-nude, non-sexually explicit photos violated his rights under federal and state law. (Id.). Defendants removed the case to this federal court. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff’s case was properly removed, but his claims did not survive preliminary review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and were dismissed on August 9, 2022. (Doc. 11). Plaintiff was granted leave to file a First Amended Complaint on or before September 6, 2022, if he intended to proceed any further with his claims in this case. (Id.). He was warned that failure to file an amended complaint by the deadline would result in dismissal of the action with prejudice. (Id. at 11) (citing FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b)). Plaintiff missed the deadline for filing the First Amended Complaint on September 6, 2022. At least a week has passed since the deadline expired. He has not requested an extension. The Court will not allow this matter to linger indefinitely. This action shall be dismissed with prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s Order (Doc. 11) to file a First Amended Complaint and/or to prosecute his claims. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b).

Disposition IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s Order (Doc. 11) to file a First Amended Complaint and/or prosecute his claims. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b); Ladien v. Astrachan, 128 F.3d 1051 (7th Cir. 1997); Johnson v. Kamminga, 34 F.3d 466 (7th Cir. 1994). The Clerk’s Office is DIRECTED to close this case and enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 9/13/2022 s/J. Phil Gilbert J. PHIL GILBERT United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Byers, Jr. v. Hill, (S.D. Ill. 2022).

Byers, Jr. v. Hill (Byers, Jr. v. Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related