Bybee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Bybee v. State

205 S.W. 985, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 442

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 23, 1918·No. No. 5126·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for a violation of the local option law. Appellant’s motion for new trial is based upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. The record is before us without, a statement of the facts.. The indictment seems to be in the usual form. Without the testimony we cannot review the questions raised in the motion for new trial

The judgment is affirmed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, P. J.

This conviction was for a violation of the local option law. Appellant’s motion for new trial is based upon the ground that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence. The record is before us without, a statement of the facts.. The indictment seems to be in the usual form. Without the testimony we cannot review the questions raised in the motion for new trial

The judgment is affirmed. .

Bybee v. State, 205 S.W. 985, 1918 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 442 (Tex. 1918).

Pincite

205 S.W. 985 (Bybee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.