B.W., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 2025
Docket3D2024-1209
StatusPublished

This text of B.W., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida (B.W., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B.W., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed July 16, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-1209 Lower Tribunal No. J24-2 ________________

B.W., a Juvenile, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dawn Denaro, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Jennifer Thornton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Haccord J. Curry, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See K.O. v. State, 267 So. 3d 427, 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)

(“The officer was investigating a call regarding trespassers . . . . By

responding to the call, the officers were engaged in the lawful execution of a

legal duty.”); P.B.P. v. State, 955 So. 2d 618, 624–25 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)

(concluding that police officers investigating anonymous call complaining

about juveniles running through backyards of homes at night constituted

lawful execution of legal duty); Brandful v. State, 858 So. 2d 367, 370 (Fla.

3d DCA 2003) (“[I]nvestigating a complaint constitutes the lawful execution

of a legal duty.”); V.L. v. State, 790 So. 2d 1140, 1142 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)

(“The investigation of a crime by a police officer is an execution of a lawful

duty.”); Francis v. State, 736 So. 2d 97, 98–99 n.1 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)

(acknowledging that officer investigating 911 call was lawful execution of

legal duty); see also Bass v. State, 304 So. 3d 786, 792–93 (Fla. 1st DCA

2018) (citing cases); In re J.B., 621 So. 2d 489, 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“A

911 call is a cry to the authorities for help. And until the investigating officer

is reasonably satisfied that no emergency exists, he is within his legal duty

to investigate such calls in a manner consistent with their emergency

nature.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brandful v. State
858 So. 2d 367 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
In Interest of JB
621 So. 2d 489 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Francis v. State
736 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
K.O., A CHILD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
267 So. 3d 427 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
P.B.P. v. State
955 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
B.W., a Juvenile v. the State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bw-a-juvenile-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.