BV v. TV
This text of BV v. TV (BV v. TV) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX 11-MAR-2020 08:37 AM
SCWC-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
BV Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant
vs.
TV Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Appellee
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX, FC-D No. 16-1-097k)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ. with Recktenwald, C.J. dissenting)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ
of certiorari, filed on January 27, 2020, is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 11, 2020.
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
BV v. TV, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bv-v-tv-haw-2020.