B.V. v. Department of Children & Family Services
Opinion
B.V. challenges the trial court’s order finding his twin daughters, L.V. and S.V., dependent as to him.1 B.V. argues, and [197]*197the Department concedes, that the trial court erred in admitting a significant amount of evidence that was inadmissible hearsay. See In the Interest of AC., 751 So.2d 667, 669 n. 1 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Williams v. Dep’t of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 589 So.2d 359, 360 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991). Without this inadmissible evidence, there is insufficient evidence to find L.V. and S.V. dependent as to B.V. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order of dependency as to B.V. and remand for the Department to return L.V. and S.V. to B.V.’s care.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
813 So. 2d 196 (B.V. v. Department of Children & Family Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.