Buzzeo v. Buzzeo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buzzeo v. Buzzeo

94 A.D.2d 711, 462 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18151

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 9, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 94 A.D.2d 711 (Buzzeo v. Buzzeo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Buzzeo v. Buzzeo, 94 A.D.2d 711, 462 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18151 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a divorce action, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Morrison, J.), entered September 9,1982, as continued a prior order of the same court (Geiler, J.), dated July 16, 1981, which, inter alia, directed him to pay $30 per week for the defendant wife’s support and maintenance and to pay carrying charges on the marital residence. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record at bar indicates that the provision of the judgment of divorce from which plaintiff appeals merely continues the temporary provisions for maintenance and payment of the carrying charges on the marital residence pending a hearing to determine the equitable distribution of the marital property and a permanent award of maintenance. Accordingly, plaintiff’s contentions, which are based on the erroneous conclusion that the awards are permanent, are without merit. Gulotta, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a divorce action, the plaintiff husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Morrison, J.), entered September 9,1982, as continued a prior order of the same court (Geiler, J.), dated July 16, 1981, which, inter alia, directed him to pay $30 per week for the defendant wife’s support and maintenance and to pay carrying charges on the marital residence. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. The record at bar indicates that the provision of the judgment of divorce from which plaintiff appeals merely continues the temporary provisions for maintenance and payment of the carrying charges on the marital residence pending a hearing to determine the equitable distribution of the marital property and a permanent award of maintenance. Accordingly, plaintiff’s contentions, which are based on the erroneous conclusion that the awards are permanent, are without merit. Gulotta, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 A.D.2d 711, 462 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buzzeo-v-buzzeo-nyappdiv-1983.