Buzby v. Darnell

52 N.J. Eq. 337
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 15, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 52 N.J. Eq. 337 (Buzby v. Darnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buzby v. Darnell, 52 N.J. Eq. 337 (N.J. 1894).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the ordinary.

For affirmance — Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Yan Syckel, Brown, Krueger — 7.

For reversal — Dixon, Bogert — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In RE ESTATE OF DuBOIS
76 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re Fineman
66 A.2d 357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
In Re Amsden
191 A. 801 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
In Re Ferris
169 A. 697 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 N.J. Eq. 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buzby-v-darnell-nj-1894.