Buzby v. Darnell

52 N.J. Eq. 337
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 15, 1894·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Decree affirmed, for the reasons given by the ordinary.

For affirmance — Depue, Garrison, Lippincott, Reed, Yan Syckel, Brown, Krueger — 7.

For reversal — Dixon, Bogert — 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Buzby v. Darnell, 52 N.J. Eq. 337 (N.J. 1894).

52 N.J. Eq. 337 (Buzby v. Darnell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In RE ESTATE OF DuBOIS
76 A.2d 33 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
In Re Fineman
66 A.2d 357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
In Re Amsden
191 A. 801 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1937)
In Re Ferris
169 A. 697 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1934)