Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
183 A.D. 901
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
No opinion. Mills, Rich and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Blaekmar, J., dissented for the reason that they are of opinion that the defendant did not admit in its pleadings that it was engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, or that the plaintiff ■ at the time of the accident was so engaged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 183 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
183 A.D. 901 (Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Buynofsky v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
126 N.E. 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)