Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
183 A.D. 901
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 183 A.D. 901 (Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Buynofsky v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 183 A.D. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
Opinion
No opinion. Mills, Rich and Kelly, JJ., concurred; Jenks, P. J., and Blaekmar, J., dissented for the reason that they are of opinion that the defendant did not admit in its pleadings that it was engaged exclusively in interstate commerce, or that the plaintiff ■ at the time of the accident was so engaged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Buynofsky v. . Lehigh Valley R.R. Co.
126 N.E. 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
183 A.D. 901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buynofsky-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-nyappdiv-1918.