Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Buxhoeveden v. Estonian State Bank

Buxhoeveden v. Estonian State Bank

265 A.D. 966
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 30, 1942
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 265 A.D. 966 (Buxhoeveden v. Estonian State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buxhoeveden v. Estonian State Bank, 265 A.D. 966 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Opinion

As matter of law, upon the undisputed facts disclosed in the record, Kaiv, the Acting Consul General of Estonia, was vested with authority to make, through Messrs. Kirlin, Campbell, Hiekox, Keating & McGrann, his attorneys, on behalf of the defendant, the motion which resulted in the order appealed from. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
265 A.D. 966, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buxhoeveden-v-estonian-state-bank-nyappdiv-1942.