Buxbaum v. Buxbaum

551 N.E.2d 592, 75 N.Y.2d 791, 552 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 32
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 9, 1990
StatusPublished

This text of 551 N.E.2d 592 (Buxbaum v. Buxbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Buxbaum v. Buxbaum, 551 N.E.2d 592, 75 N.Y.2d 791, 552 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 32 (N.Y. 1990).

Opinion

Treating defendant’s papers as seeking leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order entered April 24, 1989, motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (2) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [2] [iii]); treating defendant’s papers as seeking leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order entered September 13, 1989, motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
551 N.E.2d 592, 75 N.Y.2d 791, 552 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buxbaum-v-buxbaum-ny-1990.