Buxbaum v. Buxbaum
This text of 551 N.E.2d 592 (Buxbaum v. Buxbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Treating defendant’s papers as seeking leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order entered April 24, 1989, motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.11 (d) (2) (iii) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11 [d] [2] [iii]); treating defendant’s papers as seeking leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order entered September 13, 1989, motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 N.E.2d 592, 75 N.Y.2d 791, 552 N.Y.S.2d 99, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/buxbaum-v-buxbaum-ny-1990.