Butts v. State
45 S.E. 593, 118 Ga. 750, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 671
Opinion
1. “In order to properly present for decision by the Supreme Court the question whether or not error was committed in admitting given evidence, it must appear that objection was made to it and passed upon by the court at the time it was offered, and also what the objection was.” Cooper v. Chamblee, 114 Ga. 116.
2. The evidence in behalf of the State, though circumstantial, fully warranted the finding of the jury that the accused was, as charged in the indictment, guilty of the offense of simple larceny.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Butts v. State, 45 S.E. 593, 118 Ga. 750, 1903 Ga. LEXIS 671 (Ga. 1903).
45 S.E. 593 (Butts v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Edenfield v. State
141 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Stewart v. State
140 S.E. 415 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Duke v. Ayers
136 S.E. 410 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Simmons v. State
74 S.E. 1000 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)
Powell v. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.
49 S.E. 759 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)