Butts v. Rothschild Bros. Hat Co.

159 P. 245, 60 Okla. 86, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1278
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 25, 1916
Docket7505
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 159 P. 245 (Butts v. Rothschild Bros. Hat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Butts v. Rothschild Bros. Hat Co., 159 P. 245, 60 Okla. 86, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1278 (Okla. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

BLEAKMORE, C.

On appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Coal county, supersedeas bond was filed, executed by the plaintiffs in error as principals, and E. R. Bunch and R. A. Arnold as sureties, to stay said judgment. On July 11, 1916, there was judgment of this court against appellants ; and motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang & Co., 49 Okla. 342, 152 Pac. 1078, the motion is sustained.

Judgment is therefore entered in this court against E. R. Bunch and S. A. Arnold, in the sum of .$199.47. together with interest thereon at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 29th day of September, 1914, and all costs of the action.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilcox v. Wootton
1916 OK 770 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 P. 245, 60 Okla. 86, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 1278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/butts-v-rothschild-bros-hat-co-okla-1916.